Abstract
Symptomatic intracranial stenoses are an important cause of stroke and have a high risk of recurrent stroke with medical therapy. The Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Arterial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial unexpectedly showed a higher-than-expected rate of complications with intracranial stenting and a lower-than-expected recurrence rate with medical therapy. In this commentary, the authors review possible explanations for these findings and suggest future strategies for study. © 2011 American Heart Association, Inc.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Abou-Chebl, A., & Steinmetz, H. (2012). Critique of “stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis” by Chimowitz et al in the new England journal of medicine. Stroke, 43(2), 616–620. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.641563
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.