Critique of "stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis" by Chimowitz et al in the new England journal of medicine

79Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Symptomatic intracranial stenoses are an important cause of stroke and have a high risk of recurrent stroke with medical therapy. The Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Arterial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial unexpectedly showed a higher-than-expected rate of complications with intracranial stenting and a lower-than-expected recurrence rate with medical therapy. In this commentary, the authors review possible explanations for these findings and suggest future strategies for study. © 2011 American Heart Association, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abou-Chebl, A., & Steinmetz, H. (2012). Critique of “stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis” by Chimowitz et al in the new England journal of medicine. Stroke, 43(2), 616–620. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.641563

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free