An Updated Guide to Robust Statistical Methods in Neuroscience

35Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is a vast array of new and improved methods for comparing groups and studying associations that offer the potential for substantially increasing power, providing improved control over the probability of false positives, and yielding a deeper and more nuanced understanding of data. These new techniques effectively deal with four insights into when and why conventional methods can be unsatisfactory. But for the non-statistician, this vast array of techniques for comparing groups and studying associations can seem daunting. This article briefly reviews when and why conventional methods can have relatively low power and yield misleading results. The main goal is to suggest guidelines regarding the use of modern techniques that improve upon classic approaches such as Pearson's correlation, ordinary linear regression, ANOVA, and ANCOVA. This updated version includes recent advances dealing with effect sizes, including situations where there is a covariate. The R code, figures, and accompanying notebooks have been updated as well. © 2023 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wilcox, R. R., & Rousselet, G. A. (2023). An Updated Guide to Robust Statistical Methods in Neuroscience. Current Protocols, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/cpz1.719

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free