Administration routes affect thrombolytic effect of catheter-directed thrombolysis with pro-urokinase in treating deep vein thrombosis

Abstract

BACKGROUND Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a common disorder with a significant mortality rate. Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) is a preferred treatment for DVT patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the thrombolytic effect of CDT with pro-urokinase (pro-UK) in different administration routes. METHODS An inferior vena cava (IVC) model was induced in 36 New Zealand white rabbits by catheter injury and placement of IVC filter. The animals were divided into 6 groups with 6 rabbits in each group: group A: systemic thrombolysis with intravenous injection; group B: CDT with pump infusion; group C: CDT with pulse injection; group D: CDT with combination of pump infusion and pulse injection; group E: catheter-directed aspiration thrombectomy; group F: mechanical thrombectomy. The thrombolytic effects were evaluated by color Doppler ultrasound and blood measurement of D-dimer and fibrinogen. RESULTS The minimum effective concentration of pro-UK solution was identified. Two groups (group A and B) did not achieve successful thrombolysis. Among all catheter-directed administration groups, the rabbit groups that received pro-UK therapy through catheter-directed thrombolytic pump infusion combined with pulse injection (group D) showed the best thrombolysis effect. In contrast, catheter-directed aspiration thrombectomy (group E) is effective but not safe. CONCLUSIONS CDT with combination of pump infusion and pulse injection of pro-UK safely and significantly improves thrombolysis procedure in rabbits, suggesting potential benefits from the use of CDT in proximal DVT.