Endotyping of Cholesteatoma: Which Molecular Biomarkers? A Systematic Review

6Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: So far, no medical treatment is available for cholesteatoma (C) and the only effective therapy is complete surgical removal, but recurrence is common even after surgical treatment. While C is classically divided into two clinical phenotypes, congenital and acquired, only a few studies have focused on its potential biomarkers. This study aims to revise the literature to identify which biomarkers can define the endotype of C. Methods: We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) process to identify published experimental articles about molecular biomarkers in C. Results: KGF and its receptor, MMP-9, KRT-1, KRT-10, and MIF might be considered biomarkers of recurrence, whereas Ki-67, TLR-4, RANKL, IL17, MMP-2, MMP-9, IL6, TNF-α, should be considered more specifically as biomarkers of bony erosion. Conclusions: These results are interesting especially from a prognostic point of view, nevertheless more studies are needed to search new biomarkers of C that could completely change not only the therapeutic standards of the disease, but also the clinical history of C itself in the era of precision medicine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cantone, E., Di Nola, C., De Corso, E., Cavaliere, M., Grimaldi, G., Fetoni, A. R., & Motta, G. (2022, August 1). Endotyping of Cholesteatoma: Which Molecular Biomarkers? A Systematic Review. Journal of Personalized Medicine. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081347

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free