Keeping the human in the loop: are autonomous decisions inevitable?

10Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Control rooms play a crucial role in monitoring and managing safety-critical systems, such as power grids, emergency response, and transportation networks. As these systems become increasingly complex and generate more data, the role of human operators is evolving amid growing reliance on automation and autonomous decision-making. This paper explores the balance between leveraging automation for efficiency and preserving human intuition and ethical judgment, particularly in high-stakes scenarios. Through an analysis of control room trends, operator attitudes, and models of human-computer collaboration, this paper highlights the benefits and challenges of automation, including risks of deskilling, automation bias, and accountability. The paper advocates for a hybrid approach of collaborative autonomy, where humans and systems work in partnership to ensure transparency, trust, and adaptability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pöhler, J., Flegel, N., Mentler, T., & Van Laerhoven, K. (2025). Keeping the human in the loop: are autonomous decisions inevitable? I-Com, 24(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2024-0068

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free