The “Big Two” in Hiring Discrimination: Evidence From a Cross-National Field Experiment

13Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We tested whether signaling warmth and competence (“Big Two”) in job applications increases hiring chances. Drawing on a field experimental data from five European countries, we analyzed the responses of employers (N = 13,162) to applications from fictitious candidates of different origin: native candidates and candidates of European, Asian, or Middle-Eastern/African descent. We found that competence signals slightly increased invitation rates, while warmth signals had no effect. We also found ethnic discrimination, a female premium, and differences in callbacks depending on job characteristics. Importantly, however, providing stereotype signals did not reduce the level of ethnic discrimination or the female premium. Likewise, we found little evidence for interactions between stereotype signals and job demands. While speaking against the importance of “Big Two” signals in application documents, our results highlight the importance of group membership and hopefully stimulate further research on the role of in particular ethnic stereotypes for discrimination in hiring.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Veit, S., Arnu, H., Di Stasio, V., Yemane, R., & Coenders, M. (2022). The “Big Two” in Hiring Discrimination: Evidence From a Cross-National Field Experiment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220982900

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free