Influences of hydraulic boundary conditions on the deep fluid flow in a 3D regional model (central Upper Rhine Graben)

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Knowledge of groundwater flow is of high relevance for groundwater management or the planning of different subsurface utilizations such as deep geothermal facilities. While numerical models can help to understand the hydrodynamics of the targeted reservoir, their predictive capabilities are limited by the assumptions made in their setup. Among others, the choice of appropriate hydraulic boundary conditions, adopted to represent the regional to local flow dynamics in the simulation run, is of crucial importance for the final modelling result. In this work, we systematically address this problematic in the area of the central part of the Upper Rhine Graben. We quantify how and to which degree different upper boundary conditions and vertical cross-boundary fluid movement influence the calculated deep fluid flow conditions in the area under study. Robust results, which are insensitive to the choice of boundary condition, are: (i) a regional groundwater flow component descending from the graben shoulders to rise at its centre and (ii) the presence of heterogeneous hydraulic potentials at the rift shoulders. Contrarily, results affected by the chosen boundary conditions are: (i) calculated flow velocities, (ii) the absolute position of the upflow axis, and (iii) the evolving local flow dynamics. If, in general, the investigated area is part of a supra-regional flow system—like the central Upper Rhine Graben is part of the entire Upper Rhine Graben—the inflow and outflow across vertical model boundaries need to be considered.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koltzer, N., Kommana, G., Cacace, M., Frick, M., Bott, J., & Scheck-Wenderoth, M. (2022). Influences of hydraulic boundary conditions on the deep fluid flow in a 3D regional model (central Upper Rhine Graben). Environmental Earth Sciences, 81(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-10111-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free