Abstract
Objective: This study sought to determine the extent to which key aspects of a clinical trial's protocol were recalled by participants entering a clinical trial for alcohol and illicit substance-use treatment after standard informed-consent procedures, as well as to explore the possible relationships between recall, neuropsychological functioning, and substance-use outcomes. Method: Before entering a randomized clinical trial testing the effectiveness of a computer-based training version of cognitive-behavioral therapy, 76 participants (55% male) meeting criteria for current substance dependence (according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition) completed a 14-item true/false quiz that assessed their comprehension of basic information provided in the consent form. Results: Only 15% of participants correctly answered all 14 consent quiz items. The percentage of correct recall was associated with measures of intelligence (r =.29, p =.01) and attention (r = -.26, p =.04). Quiz scores were also moderately associated with the amount of substance use during the treatment period (r = -.26, p =.03). Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of formally evaluating research participants' understanding of the informed-consent process, and they call to attention the potential utility of a brief neuropsychological screening to identify individuals in need of enhanced consent procedures, particularly within vulnerable populations, such as substance users.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Kiluk, B. D., Nich, C., & Carroll, K. M. (2010). Neurocognitive indicators predict results of an informed-consent quiz among substance-dependent treatment seekers entering a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 71(5), 704–712. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2010.71.704
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.