Is the level of patient co-payment for medicines associated with refill adherence in Sweden?

18Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: In the Swedish reimbursement scheme, the co-payment is based on the price of the product and decreases in a stepwise manner as the total accumulated co-payment increases. The aim of this study was to analyse how refill adherence in Sweden varies according to patient's co-payment level for medicines, with antiepileptic drug (AED) use as an example. Methods: Prevalent AED users aged 18-85 years who purchased an AED between 1 January and 30 June 2007 were identified in the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register and followed for a maximum of 2 years. Patient time was categorized based on patient's accumulated co-payment for all drugs per reimbursement period. The continuous measure of medication acquisition (CMA) was used to estimate refill adherence in relation to the patients' co-payment level. Associations between patients' co-payment for all medicines and refill adherence were assessed with multilevel mixed-effects linear regression, accounting for clustering within patients. Results: The study population included 2210 patients (mean age: 56 years; 54% men). CMA for AED was 91% for patients where the co-payment corresponded to 100% of the price. Compared with these patients, refill adherence for AED was 2-4% higher (P < 0.001) for patients with reduced co-payment (co-payment of ≤50% of the price). Higher age, higher income and fenytoin use were also associated with a higher refill adherence for AED. Conclusions: Using AED as an example, a higher level of reimbursement was associated with a higher refill adherence compared with full co-payment in Sweden.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leseán, E., Sundell, K. A., Carlsten, A., Mårdby, A. C., & Jönsson, A. K. (2013). Is the level of patient co-payment for medicines associated with refill adherence in Sweden? European Journal of Public Health, 24(1), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckt062

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free