Reliability of measurements of pelvic lateral tilt in the supine and standing positions: Rater's measurement error and reproducibility of subject's posture

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to verify the reliability of measurements of pelvic lateral tilt and clinical utility, including rater's measurement error and reproducibility of subject's posture. Subjects: In this study, 10 healthy subjects (10 male; aged 19 to 23) participated from whom informed consent was received. Methods: We measured pelvic lateral tilt in 4 static postures (supine, standing with feet together, apart feet and feet wide apart) using a goniometer and a inclinometer. Two investigators measured pelvic lateral tilt in all positions. To estimate intra-rater and inter-rater reliability, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for the experimental data. Results: Intra-rater reliabilities ranged from 0.652(ICC1,1)/0.790(ICC1,2) for standing with feet together to 0.886/0.940 for standing with the feet wide apart. Inter-rater reliabilities ranged from 0.784(ICC2,1)/0.879(ICC2,2) for standing with feet apart to 0.884/0.938 for the supine position. Conclusion: We conclude that this measurement method has reasonable reliability and clinical utility.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kamiya, A., Nagoya, H., & Takei, H. (2010). Reliability of measurements of pelvic lateral tilt in the supine and standing positions: Rater’s measurement error and reproducibility of subject’s posture. Rigakuryoho Kagaku, 25(6), 919–922. https://doi.org/10.1589/rika.25.919

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free