The Role of Experts and Scholars in Community Conflict Resolution: A Comparative Analysis of Two Cases in China

3Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article, I draw from two case studies to explore the role of experts and scholars (ES), as a special third party, in community conflict resolution in contemporary China. Findings include that local ES are more likely to play the roles as leaders, organizers of farmers, and as agents of government. Nonlocal ES are more likely to play the roles as information providers and as pure self-interest pursuers. This study also reveals that, although their knowledge and information are important, knowledge and information are only preconditions for ES's participation. Their social capital–rather than the knowledge and information they possess–differentiates the effectiveness of their participation in governance and the facilitation of community conflict resolution. Local ES with high social capital are more effective in governance and facilitating community conflict resolution than nonlocal ES without high social capital.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, L. (2019). The Role of Experts and Scholars in Community Conflict Resolution: A Comparative Analysis of Two Cases in China. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 12(1), 66–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12134

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free