LyS_ACoruña at SemEval-2022 Task 10: Repurposing Off-the-Shelf Tools for Sentiment Analysis as Semantic Dependency Parsing

1Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper addressed the problem of structured sentiment analysis using a bi-affine semantic dependency parser, large pre-trained language models, and publicly available translation models. For the monolingual setup, we considered: (i) training on a single treebank, and (ii) relaxing the setup by training on treebanks coming from different languages that can be adequately processed by cross-lingual language models. For the zero-shot setup and a given target treebank, we relied on: (i) a word-level translation of available treebanks in other languages to get noisy, unlikely-grammatical, but annotated data (we release as much of it as licenses allow), and (ii) merging those translated treebanks to obtain training data. In the post-evaluation phase, we also trained cross-lingual models that simply merged all the English treebanks and did not use word-level translations, and yet obtained better results. According to the official results, we ranked 8th and 9th in the monolingual and cross-lingual setups.

References Powered by Scopus

Long Short-Term Memory

76947Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bidirectional recurrent neural networks

7364Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Lexicon-basedmethods for sentiment analysis

2423Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Neurocomputer System of Semantic Analysis of the Text in the Kazakh Language

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alonso-Alonso, I., Vilares, D., & Gomez-Rodrí­guez, C. (2022). LyS_ACoruña at SemEval-2022 Task 10: Repurposing Off-the-Shelf Tools for Sentiment Analysis as Semantic Dependency Parsing. In SemEval 2022 - 16th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, Proceedings of the Workshop (pp. 1389–1400). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.semeval-1.193

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

38%

Researcher 3

38%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 8

67%

Linguistics 2

17%

Neuroscience 1

8%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0