Urinary Cadmium and Incident Heart Failure A Case–Cohort Analysis Among Never-Smokers in Denmark

36Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Epidemiologic studies suggest cadmium exposure is associated with cardiovascular disease risk, including heart failure. However, prior findings may be influenced by tobacco smoking, a dominant source of cadmium exposure and risk factor for heart failure. The present study leverages up to 20 years of follow-up in the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort to examine the relationship between urinary cadmium and incident heart failure among people who never smoked. Methods: Between 1993 and 1997, 19,394 never-smoking participants (ages 50–64 years) enrolled and provided a urine sample. From this sample, we randomly selected a subcohort of 600 men and 600 women and identified 958 incident heart failure cases occurring between baseline and 2015. Using a case–cohort approach, we estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for heart failure in Cox proportional hazards models with age as the time scale. Results: Participants had relatively low concentrations of urinary cadmium, as expected for never smokers (median = 0.20; 25th, 75th = 0.13, 0.32 μg cadmium/g creatinine). In adjusted models, we found that higher urinary cadmium was associated with a higher rate of incident heart failure overall (aHR = 1.1 per interquartile range difference [95% CI = 1.0, 1.2). In sex-stratified analyses, the association seemed restricted to men (aHR = 1.5 [95% CI = 1.2, 1.9]). Conclusions: In this cohort of people who never smoked tobacco, environmental cadmium was positively associated with incident heart failure, especially among men.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sears, C. G., Eliot, M., Raaschou-Nielsen, O., Poulsen, A. H., Harrington, J. M., Howe, C. J., … Wellenius, G. A. (2022). Urinary Cadmium and Incident Heart Failure A Case–Cohort Analysis Among Never-Smokers in Denmark. Epidemiology, 33(2), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001446

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free