Mismatching Expressions: Spatiotemporal and Kinematic Differences in Autistic and Non‐Autistic Facial Expressions

  • Keating C
  • Sowden‐Carvalho S
  • O′Donoghue H
  • et al.
2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Preliminary studies suggest there are differences in the facial expressions produced by autistic and non‐autistic individuals. However, it is unclear what specifically is different, whether such differences remain after controlling for facial morphology and alexithymia, and whether production differences relate to perception differences. Therefore, we (1) comprehensively compared the spatiotemporal and kinematic properties of autistic and non‐autistic expressions after controlling these factors, and (2) examined the contribution of production‐related variables to emotion perception. We used facial motion capture to record 2448 cued and 2448 spoken expressions of anger, happiness, and sadness from autistic and matched non‐autistic adults. Subsequently, we extracted the activation and jerkiness of numerous facial landmarks across time, generating over 265 million datapoints. Participants also completed an emotion recognition task. Autistic participants relied more on the mouth, and less on the eyebrows, to signal anger than their non‐autistic peers. For happiness, autistic participants showed a less exaggerated smile that also did not “reach the eyes.” For sadness, autistic participants tended to produce a downturned expression by raising their upper lip more than their non‐autistic peers. Alexithymia predicted less differentiated angry and happy expressions. For non‐autistic individuals, those who produced more precise spoken expressions had greater emotion recognition accuracy. No production‐related factors contributed to autistic emotion recognition. This mismatch could explain why autistic people find it difficult to recognize non‐autistic expressions, and vice versa; autistic and non‐autistic faces may be essentially “speaking a different language” when conveying emotion.This study compared the facial expressions produced by autistic and non‐autistic people. Our findings demonstrate that autistic and non‐autistic adults produce different angry, happy, and sad facial expressions, even after accounting for other interfering factors. This mismatch in facial expressions could explain why autistic people find it difficult to recognize non‐autistic expressions, and vice versa; autistic and non‐autistic faces may be essentially “speaking a different language” when it comes to conveying emotion. As such, what have previously been thought of as intrinsic emotion recognition “deficits” for autistic people may be more accurately described as difficulties resulting from cross‐neurotype interactions (i.e., interactions between autistic and non‐autistic people, as opposed to interactions between two autistic people). Further research is needed to test the impact of expressive differences on emotion recognition for autistic and non‐autistic people.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Keating, C. T., Sowden‐Carvalho, S., O′Donoghue, H., & Cook, J. L. (2026). Mismatching Expressions: Spatiotemporal and Kinematic Differences in Autistic and Non‐Autistic Facial Expressions. Autism Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.70157

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free