Evaluation of research publications and publication channels in astronomy and astrophysics

0Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The astronomy community usually turns to the Astrophysics Data System for bibliometrics. When the context is cross-disciplinary, commercial products like Web of Science and Scopus are used along with related analytics tools instead. The results are often tainted by inherent problems in the chosen classification system. A review of the most common challenges and pitfalls is given. Commercial altmetrics products could be added to the evaluation toolbox in the near future despite the fact that they are best suited for promotion instead of evaluation. Norway, Denmark, and Finland have created journal and publisher ranking systems that are used in national funding models. Differences in how astronomy journals are weighed in these systems night be related to the volume of papers published on a national level.

References Powered by Scopus

Intriguing trends in nuclear physics authorship

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A thousand invisible cords binding astronomy and high-energy physics

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Isaksson, E., & Vesterinen, H. (2018). Evaluation of research publications and publication channels in astronomy and astrophysics. In EPJ Web of Conferences (Vol. 186). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818606002

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

25%

Researcher 2

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 7

70%

Social Sciences 1

10%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

10%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free