A Prospective Randomized Trial of Vacuum-Assisted Closure Versus Standard Therapy of Chronic Nonhealing Wounds

298Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Chronic, open, nonhealing wounds pose a continual challenge in medicine. Our objective was to evaluate vacuum-assisted closure (VAC)* therapy's ability to improve the healing rate of chronic wounds compared to the traditional saline-wet-to-moist (WM) dressings. Twenty-four patients with 36 chronic, nonhealing wounds were enrolled in the study after obtaining proper consent. Subjects were randomized to the VAC group or the control group. Biopsies and wound measurements were obtained by blinded independent wound evaluators. The most significant difference was the change in depth of 66 percent for VAC compared to 20 percent for WM (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Joseph, E., Hamori, C. A., Bergman, S., Roaf, E., Swann, N. F., & Anastasi, G. W. (2000). A Prospective Randomized Trial of Vacuum-Assisted Closure Versus Standard Therapy of Chronic Nonhealing Wounds. Wounds, 12(3), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2016/733

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free