General practitioners' perceptions towards the use of digital health services for citizens in primary care: A qualitative interview study

51Citations
Citations of this article
204Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives To explore general practitioners' (GPs) perceptions towards use of four digital health services for citizens: an electronic booking service to make reservations with the GP; an electronic prescription service to request renewal of maintenance drugs; a service for text-based non-clinical enquiries to the GP office and a service for text-based electronic consultation (e-consultation) with the GP. Design A qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews. Setting Primary care. Participants Nine GPs who were early adopters of the four services were interviewed. Method One moderator presented topics using open-ended questions, facilitated the discussion and followed up with further questions. Phone interviews were conducted, audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative data were analysed using the framework method. Results The use of digital services in primary care in Norway is growing, although the use of text-based e-consultations is still limited. Most GPs were positive about all four services, but there was still some scepticism regarding their effects. Advantages for GP offices included reduced phone load, increased efficiency, released time for medical assessments, less crowded waiting rooms and more precise communication. Benefits for patients were increased flexibility, autonomy and time and money savings. Children, the elderly and people with low computer literacy might still need traditional alternatives. Conclusions More defined and standardised routines, as well as more evidence of the effects, are necessary for large-scale adoption.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fagerlund, A. J., Holm, I. M., & Zanaboni, P. (2019). General practitioners’ perceptions towards the use of digital health services for citizens in primary care: A qualitative interview study. BMJ Open, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028251

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free