Board Composition, Sustainability Reporting, and the Moderating Role of a Contextual Issue: Evidence From an Emerging Country

3Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study examines the impact of board composition (BC) on sustainability reporting (SR) in financial firms listed on the Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE), with a focus on the moderating role of non-performing loans (NPLs). Using 421 firm-year observations from 49 firms (2016–2024) and an ordinary least squares (OLS) regression model, the results show that boards with more independent, female, and foreign directors are associated with higher SR disclosures. Foreign directors positively influence both environmental and social disclosures, while independent and female directors are significantly linked to social disclosures. The effect of gender diversity is stronger when boards include at least three female directors, especially when one is also independent. However, higher levels of NPLs weaken the positive impact of foreign directorship on SR. Grounded in agency, resource dependence, and critical mass theories, the study offers insights for scholars, regulators, and policymakers on the role of board diversity in promoting sustainability in the financial sector.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Das, S. K., & Akter, P. (2026). Board Composition, Sustainability Reporting, and the Moderating Role of a Contextual Issue: Evidence From an Emerging Country. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 33(2), 1832–1855. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70258

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free