Improvement of contrast sensitivity with practice is not compatible with a sensory threshold account

  • Solomon J
  • Tyler C
5Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In forced-choice detection, incorrect responses are routinely ascribed to internal noise, because experienced psychophysical observers do not act as if they have a sensory threshold, below which all perceived intensities would be identical. To determine whether inexperienced observers have sensory thresholds, we examined psychometric functions (percent correct versus log contrast) for detection and detection in full-screen, dynamic visual noise. Over five days, neither type of psychometric function changed shape, but both shifted leftwards, indicating increased sensitivity. These results are not consistent with a lowered sensory threshold, which would decrease psychometric slope. Our results can be understood within the context of Dosher and Lu's "stochastic" perceptual template model [Vis. Res.40, 1269 (2000)], augmented to allow intrinsic uncertainty. Specifically, our results are consistent with a combination of reduced internal additive noise and improved filtering of external noise.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Solomon, J. A., & Tyler, C. W. (2017). Improvement of contrast sensitivity with practice is not compatible with a sensory threshold account. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 34(6), 870. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.34.000870

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free