Inconsistency in Managers’ Disclosure Tone: The Signalling Perspective

7Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article examines the factors contributing to the disparity in managers’ disclosure tone from a signalling perspective. According to this viewpoint, managers intentionally choose their tone to convey information to the market. To determine the origin of tone inconsistency, we explored the association between future financial performance (as measured by the rate of return on assets (ROA) and rate of return on equity (ROE)) and future financial risk (as measured by the standard deviation of ROA and ROE) with the tone of management discussion and analyses (MD&As). The Loughran and McDonald dictionaries were utilised to assess managers’ tone in the MD&As. Our dataset consisted of 1510 MD&As from 156 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, covering 2013 to 2022. Multiple regression analysis was employed, controlling for industry and year fixed effects. The findings revealed a significant relationship between future financial performance, future financial risk, and MD&A tone inconsistency. Thus, the biased tone observed in Iranian managers’ MD&As can be explained by signalling theory. This study contributes to the existing literature by being the first to investigate signalling as a source of inconsistency in managers’ disclosure tone.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pouryousof, A., Nassirzadeh, F., & Askarany, D. (2023). Inconsistency in Managers’ Disclosure Tone: The Signalling Perspective. Risks, 11(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11120205

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free