0608 Concordance Between Current AASM And CMS Scoring Criteria for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Hospitalized Persons with TBI: A NIDILRR and VA Model System Study

Abstract

Methods: This is a prospective diagnostic comparative effectiveness trial of sleep apnea screening tools (STOPBANG, Berlin, MAPI [Multi-Apnea Prediction Index]) relative Level 1 polysomnography at six TBI Model System Inpatient Rehabilitation Centers. Between 05/2017 and 02/2019, 449 of 896 screened were eligible for the trial with 345 consented (77% consented). Additional screening left 263 eligible for and completing polysomnography with final analyses completed on 248. The primary outcome was the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of screening tools relative to total apnea hypopnea index ≥15 (AHI, moderate to severe apnea) measured at a median of 47 days post-TBI (IQR 29-47). Results: Participants were primarily young to middle age (AGE IQR 28,40,59), male (81%), white (74%), and had primarily severe TBI (IQR GCS 3,6,14). A subset (26%) had a history of military service. Results revealed that the Berlin high risk score (ROC-AUC=0.63) was inferior to the MAPI (ROC-AUC = 0.7802) (p=.0211, CI: 0.0181, 0.2233) and STOPBANG (ROCAUC = 0.7852) (p=.0006, CI: 0.0629, 0.2302); both of which had comparable AUC (p=.7245, CI:-0.0472, 0.0678). Findings were similar for AHI≥30 (severe apnea); however, no differences across scales was observed at AHI>5. The pattern was similar across TBI severity subgroups except for delirium or post-traumatic amnesia status wherein the MAPI outperformed the Berlin and STOPBANG. Youden's Index to determine risk yielded lower sensitivities but higher specificities relative to non-TBI samples. Conclusion: This study is the first to provide clinicians with data to support a choice for which sleep apnea screening tools are more effective during inpatient rehabilitation for moderate to severe TBI (STOPBANG, MAPI vs Berlin) to help reduce comorbidity and possibly improve neurologic outcome. Introduction: Recent work on US non-Latino Whites and Europeans from clinical samples used obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) symptoms to generate OSA phenotypes for individuals with moderate-severe OSA and proposed between 3-5 clusters. Validating these clusters in a diverse Hispanic/Latino community-based population with different biopsychosocial characteristics is crucial for early OSA identification and more personalized treatment. Methods: This work is based on baseline data from The Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL). HCHS/ SOL is a prospective cohort study designed using a multisite (Bronx, NY, Chicago, IL, Miami, FL, San Diego, CA) multistage probability sample. The subpopulation of interest included adults 18-74 years (unweighted n=1,623) meeting criteria for moderate-severe OSA symptoms (≥15 Apnea-Hypopnea index (AHI) events per hour). We performed latent class analysis (LCA) using 15 common OSA symptoms to identify phenotype clusters. Results: Average age was 52.4 ± 13.9 years and 34.1% were female. Mean AHI was 33.8 ± 22.5 events per hour. Fit statistics and clinical significance suggested that a three-class solution provided best fit to the data. The symptom profiles were consistent with (1) a Minimally Symptomatic group (46.8%), (2) a Disturbed Sleep group (38.1%), and (3) a Daytime Sleepiness group (15.1%). Validation analyses using alternative hierarchical and partitioning algorithms also suggested support for a three-class solution. Conclusion: Sleep apnea phenotypes among diverse Hispanics/ Latinos were consistent with recent findings from the Sleep Apnea Global Interdisciplinary Consortium. However, we found notable differences in the prevalence of these clusters relative to Whites. This suggests that other biopsychosocial factors may be contributing to OSA phenotypes among Hispanics/Latinos. Identification of OSA phenotypes in Hispanics/Latinos could inform better sleep interventions and therapeutics and help better align public health resources. Support: 5R01AG048642-05; R21AG056952; R21HL140437. Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare OSA, demographic, and TBI characteristics across the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) and Centers for Medicare and Medicare (CMS) scoring rules in moderate to severe TBI undergoing inpatient neurorehabilitation. Methods: This is a secondary analysis from a prospective clinical trial of sleep apnea at six TBI Model System study sites (n=248).