Error Metrics and Performance Fitness Indicators for Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Engineering and Sciences

313Citations
Citations of this article
316Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and Machine learning (ML) train machines to achieve a high level of cognition and perform human-like analysis. Both AI and ML seemingly fit into our daily lives as well as complex and interdisciplinary fields. With the rise of commercial, open-source, and user-catered AI/ML tools, a key question often arises whenever AI/ML is applied to explore a phenomenon or a scenario: what constitutes a good AI/ML model? Keeping in mind that a proper answer to this question depends on various factors, this work presumes that a goodmodel optimally performs and best describes the phenomenon on hand. From this perspective, identifying proper assessment metrics to evaluate the performance of AI/ML models is not only necessary but is also warranted. As such, this paper examines 78 of the most commonly-used performance fitness and error metrics for regression and classification algorithms, with emphasis on engineering and sciences applications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Naser, M. Z., & Alavi, A. H. (2023, December 1). Error Metrics and Performance Fitness Indicators for Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Engineering and Sciences. Architecture, Structures and Construction. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44150-021-00015-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free