Support amongst UK pig farmers and agricultural stakeholders for the use of food losses in animal feed

17Citations
Citations of this article
118Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

While food losses (foods which were intended for human consumption, but which ultimately are not directly eaten by people) have been included in animal feed for millennia, the practice is all but banned in the European Union. Amid recent calls to promote a circular economy, we conducted a survey of pig farmers (n = 82) and other agricultural stakeholders (n = 81) at a UK agricultural trade fair on their attitudes toward the use of food losses in pig feed, and the potential relegalisation of swill (the use of cooked food losses as feed). While most respondents found the use of feeds containing animal by-products or with the potential for intra-species recycling (i.e. pigs eating pork products) to be less acceptable than feeds without, we found strong support (>75%) for the relegalisation of swill among both pig farmers and other stakeholders. We fit multi-hierarchical Bayesian models to understand people’s position on the relegalisation of swill, finding that respondents who were concerned about disease control and the perception of the pork industry supported relegalisation less, while people who were concerned with farm financial performance and efficiency or who thought that swill would benefit the environment and reduce trade-deficits, were more supportive. Our results provide a baseline estimate of support amongst the large-scale pig industry for the relegalisation of swill, and suggest that proponents for its relegalisation must address concerns about disease control and the consumer acceptance of swill-fed pork.

References Powered by Scopus

Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations

1771Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste

1130Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Statistical rethinking: A bayesian course with examples in R and stan

1087Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Future of Aquatic Protein: Implications for Protein Sources in Aquaculture Diets

561Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A systematic review of research on food loss and waste prevention and management for the circular economy

69Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Circular economy and economic development in the European Union: A review and bibliometric analysis

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

zu Ermgassen, E. K. H. J., Kelly, M., Bladon, E., Salemdeeb, R., & Balmford, A. (2018). Support amongst UK pig farmers and agricultural stakeholders for the use of food losses in animal feed. PLoS ONE, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196288

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 50

69%

Researcher 14

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 23

43%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12

23%

Business, Management and Accounting 11

21%

Environmental Science 7

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 4
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free