Cross-cultural differences in the epidemiology of unexplained fatigue syndromes in primary care

49Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Unexplained fatigue has been extensively studied but most of the samples used were from Western countries. Aims: To present international data on the prevalence of unexplained fatigue and fatigue as a presenting complaint in primary care. Method: Secondary analysis of the World Health Organization study of psychological problems in general health care. A total of 5438 primary care attenders from 14 countries were assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Results: The prevalence of unexplained fatigue of 1-month duration differed across centres, with a range between 2.26 (95% CI 1.17-4.33) and 15.05 (95% CI 10.85-20.49). Subjects from more-developed countries were more likely to report unexplained fatigue but less likely to present with fatigue to physicians compared with subjects from less developed countries. Conclusions: In less-developed countries fatigue might be an indicator of unmet psychiatric need, but in more-developed countries it is probably a symbol of psychosocial distress.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Skapinakis, P., Lewis, G., & Mavreas, V. (2003). Cross-cultural differences in the epidemiology of unexplained fatigue syndromes in primary care. British Journal of Psychiatry, 182(MAR.), 205–209. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.182.3.205

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free