UDNS or LES, That Is the Question

  • Bosshard C
  • Deville M
  • Dehbi A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the framework of the spectral element method, a comparison is carried out on turbulent first- and second-order statistics generated by large eddy simulation (LES), under-resolved (UDNS) and fully resolved direct numerical simulation (DNS). The LES is based on classical models like the dynamic Smagorinsky approach or the approximate deconvolution method. Two test problems are solved: the lid-driven cubical cavity and the differentially heated cavity. With the DNS data as benchmark solutions, it is shown that the numerical results produced by the UDNS calculation are of the same accuracy, even in some cases of better quality, as the LES computations. The conclusion advocates the use of UDNS and calls for improvement of the available algorithms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bosshard, C., Deville, M. O., Dehbi, A., & Leriche, E. (2015). UDNS or LES, That Is the Question. Open Journal of Fluid Dynamics, 05(04), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojfd.2015.54034

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free