Totally toracoscopic versus open surgery for closure of atrial septal defect: Propensity-score matched comparison

12Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare early clinical outcomes of surgical repair for isolated atrial septal defect (ASD) with a totally thoracoscopic approach without robotic assistance versus a conventional open procedure. Between September 2010 and June 2012, 254 consecutive patients with isolated ASD underwent totally thoracoscopic surgery without robotic assistance in seven institutions participating in the nationwide multi-centered registry in China. During the same period, these patients were matched using propensity score methodology with 254 patients who had accepted conventional open surgery through a median sternotomy. The early in-hospital results between the two groups were analyzed and compared. The patient age was 26.8 ± 14.0 years and weight was 52.9 ± 16.9 kg in the totally thoracoscopic group. The totally thoracoscopic surgery required longer aortic clamp time (32.1 ± 17.3 minutes versus 28.3 ± 16.7 minutes, P =.01); shorter length of stay in the intensive care unit (25.3 ± 12.2 hours versus 34.8 ± 24.4 hours, P =.001); shorter length of stay in hospital (6.5 ± 6.3 days versus 7.9 ± 6.4 days, P =.008); and shorter mechanical ventilation time (8.3 ± 5.0 hours versus 11.4 ± 14.8 hours, P =.04). The cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (62.7 ± 29.3 minutes versus 61.5 ± 28.0 minutes, P =.64) showed no significant difference between the two groups. The totally thoracoscopic group had significantly less postoperative chest tube drainage (322.1 ± 213.7 mL versus 462.8 ± 398.4 mL, P =.001). The intraoperative (35.4% versus 38.6%, P =.46) and postoperative blood products usage (20.9% versus 21.3%, P =.91) showed no significant difference between the two groups. There also was no significant difference in mortality and major in-hospital complications between the two groups. The early outcomes for treatment of isolated ASD were similar between the totally thoracoscopic group conventional open operation performed through median sternotomy, despite a longer aortic clamp time in the totally thoracoscopic group.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zheng, Z., Kun, H., Xuezeng, X., Yunge, C., Zengshan, M., Huiming, G., … Shengshou, H. (2014). Totally toracoscopic versus open surgery for closure of atrial septal defect: Propensity-score matched comparison. Heart Surgery Forum, 17(4), E227–E231. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.2014382

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free