Fuels Treatments and Tending Reduce Simulated Wildfire Impacts in Sequoia sempervirens Under Single-Tree and Group Selection

Abstract

Selection forestry sustains timber production and stand structural complexity via partial harvesting. However, regeneration initiated by harvesting may function as fuel ladders, providing pathways for fire to reach the forest canopy. We sought potential mitigation approaches by simulating stand growth and potential wildfire behavior over a century in stands dominated by coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens (Lamb. ex. D. Don) Endl.) on California’s north coast. We used the fire and fuels extension to the forest vegetation simulator (FFE-FVS) to compare group selection (GS) to single-tree selection silviculture with either low-density (LD) or high-density (HD) retention on a 20-year harvest return interval. These three approaches were paired with six options involving vegetation management (i.e., hardwood control or pre-commercial thinning (PCT)) with and without fuels treatments (i.e., prescribed fire or pile burning), or no subsequent vegetation or fuel treatment applied after GS, HD, or LD silviculture. Fuel treatment involving prescribed fire reduced hazardous fuel loading but lowered stand density and hence productivity. Hardwood control followed by prescribed fire mitigated potential wildfire behavior and promoted dominance of merchantable conifers. PCT of small young trees regenerating after selection harvests, followed by piling and burning of these cut trees, sustained timber production while reducing potential wildfire behavior by approximately 40% relative to selection silviculture without vegetation/fuel management, which exhibited the worst potential wildfire behavior.