How does familiarity affect visual search for letter strings?

23Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Subjects visually searched for letter string targets consisting of either familiar English three-letter words (e.g., SEX) or featurally similar nonword trigrams (e.g., SFX). Distractor items were either words or nonwords and had varying degrees offeature overlap with the target among different blocks of trials. Search was facilitated by a word-nonword category distinction between target and distractors, particularly when target-noise feature overlap was high, but such facilitation consisted of slope reductions in an apparently serial, self-terminating search pattern as opposed to a "pop-out" effect. © 1985 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Flowers, J. H., & Lohr, D. J. (1985). How does familiarity affect visual search for letter strings? Perception & Psychophysics, 37(6), 557–567. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204922

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free