Nuchal translucency screening: How do women actually utilize the results?

8Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To examine how women use the nuchal translucency (NT) risk adjustment in decision-making for invasive prenatal diagnosis. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of 1083 consecutive NT screening exams. A screen-positive test was defined as a risk ≥1/300. Primary outcome was what proportion of screen-positive or screen-negative women chose to undergo chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis. Results: Of the women tested, 79% (858/1083) were ≥35-years-old and 88% (756/858) of these women had a decrease in age-related risk after NT. Of the screen-negative women, 31% (238/756) ≥35 years of age chose to have invasive testing as compared to only 11.2% (25/223) of those <35 years of age (p < 0.001). Of the screen-positive women, 71% (72/102) ≥35 years of age and 100% (2/2) <35 years of age chose to obtain invasive testing (p = 0.368). Conclusion: First-trimester NT screening for Down syndrome (DS) enables a significant number of women over age 35 to lower the risk for DS several fold and avoid the risks of invasive testing. However, despite significant reductions in age-specific mid-trimester DS risks, a relatively high proportion of women ≥35 years of age still opted for invasive testing. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Caughey, A. B., Musci, T. J., Belluomini, J., Main, D., Otto, C., & Goldberg, J. (2007). Nuchal translucency screening: How do women actually utilize the results? Prenatal Diagnosis, 27(2), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.1617

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free