Exchanging words: Engaging the challenges of sharing qualitative research data

10Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In January 2023, a new NIH policy on data sharing went into effect. The policy applies to both quantitative and qualitative research (QR) data such as data from interviews or focus groups. QR data are often sensitive and difficult to deidentify, and thus have rarely been shared in the United States. Over the past 5 y, our research team has engaged stakeholders on QR data sharing, developed software to support data deidentification, produced guidance, and collaborated with the ICPSR data repository to pilot the deposit of 30 QR datasets. In this perspective article, we share important lessons learned by addressing eight clusters of questions on issues such as where, when, and what to share; how to deidentify data and support high-quality secondary use; budgeting for data sharing; and the permissions needed to share data. We also offer a brief assessment of the state of preparedness of data repositories, QR journals, and QR textbooks to support data sharing. While QR data sharing could yield important benefits to the research community, we quickly need to develop enforceable standards, expertise, and resources to support responsible QR data sharing. Absent these resources, we risk violating participant confidentiality and wasting a significant amount of time and funding on data that are not useful for either secondary use or data transparency and verification.

References Powered by Scopus

Comment: The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship

10055Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant

4782Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research

2704Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Talk of Family: How Institutional Overlap Shapes Family-Related Discourse Across Social Class

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The refined Pathways to Cures Research Roadmap for multiple sclerosis cures

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mixed Methods Studies Using Secondary Analysis in Nursing and Midwifery: A Methodological Review

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

DuBois, J. M., Mozersky, J., Parsons, M., Walsh, H. A., Friedrich, A., & Pienta, A. (2023). Exchanging words: Engaging the challenges of sharing qualitative research data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120(43). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2206981120

Readers over time

‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 1

25%

Social Sciences 1

25%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

25%

Environmental Science 1

25%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0