Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the wear resistance and surface roughness of three interim resin materials, which were subjected to chewing simulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three interim resin materials were evaluated: (1) three-dimensional (3D) printed (digital light processing type), (2) computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) milled, and (3) conventional polymethyl methacrylate interim resin materials. A total of 48 substrate specimens were prepared. The specimens were divided into two subgroups and subjected to 30,000 or 60,000 cycles of chewing simulation (n = 8). The wear volume loss and surface roughness of the materials were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s post-hoc test (α=.05). RESULTS. The mean ± standard deviation values of wear volume loss (in mm) against the metal abrader after 60,000 cycles were 0.10 ± 0.01 for the 3D printed resin, 0.21 ± 0.02 for the milled resin, and 0.44 ± 0.01 for the conventional resin. Statistically significant differences among volume losses were found in the order of 3D printed, milled, and conventional interim materials (P
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Myagmar, G., Lee, J. H., Ahn, J. S., Yeo, I. S. L., Yoon, H. I., & Han, J. S. (2021). Wear of 3D printed and CAD/CAM milled interim resin materials after chewing simulation. Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 13(3), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.4047/JAP.2021.13.3.144
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.