The rise of politics and the decline of vulnerability as criteria in disaster decisions of the United States, 1953-2009

9Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper examines the shift from vulnerability to political responsiveness in presidential and gubernatorial disaster decisions in the United States from 1953-2009 (President Dwight D. Eisenhower to President Barack Obama) using annual request, declaration, and approval data from multiple sources. It makes three key conclusions: first, the 1988 Stafford Act expanded federal coverage to all categories of disasters, added a significant range of individual types of assistance, and provided extensive funding for recovery planning. Second, the election effects on disaster decisions increased over time whereas the impact of social and economic vulnerability (measured by scope of disaster) declined. Third, the changes affected governors more than presidents, and the choices of governors drove those of presidents. The analysis underscores the increasingly political nature of the disaster decision-making process, as well as the difficulty in emphasising mitigation and preparedness as intensively as response and recovery. Proactive intervention yields fewer political rewards than responsiveness. © 2013 The Author(s). Disasters © Overseas Development Institute, 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Daniels, R. S. (2013). The rise of politics and the decline of vulnerability as criteria in disaster decisions of the United States, 1953-2009. Disasters, 37(4), 669–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12026

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free