Initial Evaluations in the Interview: Relationships with Subsequent Interviewer Evaluations and Employment Offers

88Citations
Citations of this article
231Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The authors of this study examine how evaluations made during an early stage of the structured interview (rapport building) influence end of interview scores, subsequent follow-up employment interviews, and actual internship job offers. Candidates making better initial impressions received more internship offers (r = 22) and higher interviewer ratings (r = 42). As predicted, initial evaluations of candidate competence extend beyond liking and similarity to influence subsequent interview outcomes from the same interviewer (ΔR2 = 05), from a separate interviewer (ΔR2 = 05), and from another interviewer who skipped rapport building (ΔR2 = 05). In contrast, assessments of candidate liking and similarity were not significantly related to other judgments when ratings were provided by different interviewers. The findings of this study thus indicate that initial impressions of candidates influence employment outcomes, and that they may be based on useful judgments of candidate competence that occur in the opening minutes of the structured interview. © 2010 American Psychological Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barrick, M. R., Swider, B. W., & Stewart, G. L. (2010). Initial Evaluations in the Interview: Relationships with Subsequent Interviewer Evaluations and Employment Offers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1163–1172. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019918

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free