CD4- and CD3-T Lymphocyte Reference Values of Immunocompetent Urban and Rural Subjects in an African Nation

9Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Studies on the reference values of CD4 and CD3 T cells in healthy individuals have continued to gain significance because of the importance of these immunological markers in the initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). The aim of the present study was to determine and compare the reference values of CD4 and CD3 T cells in urban and rural Nigerians who were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) negative. After ethical clearance and informed consent, 1123 subjects who met the inclusion criteria [mean age=24.4 (± 11.2) years] were recruited in this study. Blood samples were analysed using the BD FACScount cytometer according to the manufacturer's instructions. Of the overall 1123 subjects, reference means of CD4, CD3 and CD4/CD3 ratio were 1030±367, 1757±609cells/μl and 0.59±0.08, respectively. Five hundred and fifty-one (49.1%) were an urban population with the mean CD4, CD3 and CD4/CD3 T cell ratio of 1032±369, 1761±612cells/μl and 0.59 (±0.08), respectively. The remaining 572 (50.9%) were of a rural population with the mean CD4, CD3 and CD4/CD3 T cell ratio of 1028±459, 1753±958cells/μl and 0.59±0.13, respectively. Subjects with higher CD4 and CD3 T cells were more likely to be female than male (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the T cell values of the two populations (P>0.05). Our findings provide new insight in the CD4 and CD3 T cell reference values of Nigerians. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adoga, M. P., Pennap, G. R., John, P. A., Shawulu, P. T., Kaba, S. V., Forbi, J. C., & Agwale, S. M. (2012). CD4- and CD3-T Lymphocyte Reference Values of Immunocompetent Urban and Rural Subjects in an African Nation. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, 76(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3083.2012.02700.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free