Performance comparison of ventricular and arterial dP/dtmax for assessing left ventricular systolic function during different experimental loading and contractile conditions

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Maximal left ventricular (LV) pressure rise (LV dP/dtmax), a classical marker of LV systolic function, requires LV catheterization, thus surrogate arterial pressure waveform measures have been proposed. We compared LV and arterial (femoral and radial) dP/dtmax to the slope of the LV end-systolic pressure-volume relationship (Ees), a load-independent measure of LV contractility, to determine the interactions between dP/dtmax and Ees as loading and LV contractility varied. Methods: We measured LV pressure-volume data using a conductance catheter and femoral and radial arterial pressures using a fluid-filled catheter in 10 anesthetized pigs. Ees was calculated as the slope of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship during a transient inferior vena cava occlusion. Afterload was assessed by the effective arterial elastance. The experimental protocol consisted of sequentially changing afterload (phenylephrine/nitroprusside), preload (bleeding/fluid bolus), and contractility (esmolol/dobutamine). A linear-mixed analysis was used to assess the contribution of cardiac (Ees, end-diastolic volume, effective arterial elastance, heart rate, preload-dependency) and arterial factors (total vascular resistance and arterial compliance) to LV and arterial dP/dtmax. Results: Both LV and arterial dP/dtmax allowed the tracking of Ees changes, especially during afterload and contractility changes, although arterial dP/dtmax was lower compared to LV dP/dtmax (bias 732 ± 539 mmHgs-1 for femoral dP/dtmax, and 625 ± 501 mmHgs- 1 for radial dP/dtmax). Changes in cardiac contractility (Ees) were the main determinant of LV and arterial dP/dtmax changes. Conclusion: Although arterial dP/dtmax is a complex function of central and peripheral arterial factors, radial and particularly femoral dP/dtmax allowed reasonably good tracking of LV contractility changes as loading and inotropic conditions varied.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Monge Garcia, M. I., Jian, Z., Settels, J. J., Hunley, C., Cecconi, M., Hatib, F., & Pinsky, M. R. (2018). Performance comparison of ventricular and arterial dP/dtmax for assessing left ventricular systolic function during different experimental loading and contractile conditions. Critical Care, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2260-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free