Diversity in Academic Otolaryngology: An Update and Recommendations for Moving From Words to Action

38Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: (1) To investigate the state of diversity and inclusion initiatives in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery (OHNS) as compared to general surgery and (2) assess their effects on female representation in these programs. Methods: The websites of OHNS residency programs, general surgery residency programs, and their associated academic medical institutions were indexed for content related to diversity and inclusion (D&I) initiatives. Gender data were gathered and used as a proxy for identity diversity. Results: All programs surveyed (N = 198) have D&I programs at the institutional level and have an office of D&I (or equivalent program). However, only 18% of general surgery programs and 19% of otolaryngology programs have additional department-level D&I initiatives. There was an increase in the proportion of female residents across all residency programs if the program mentioned D&I on their website (44% vs 38%, P =.004) and if the program reported a D&I initiative (45% vs 38%, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, J. B., Chiu, A. G., Sykes, K. J., Eck, L. P., Hierl, A. N., & Villwock, J. A. (2021). Diversity in Academic Otolaryngology: An Update and Recommendations for Moving From Words to Action. Ear, Nose and Throat Journal, 100(10), 702–709. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145561320922633

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free