A survey of general practitioners' views on autopsy reports

17Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims - To study the views of general practitioners on the quality and utility of autopsy reports, and on autopsies in general. Methods - For a period of six months, a questionnaire was enclosed with each autopsy report sent to a general practitioner from the mortuary at Manchester Royal Infirmary. Results - Most (93.3%) general practitioners found the autopsy report useful, and many (66.7%) thought the bereaved relatives would do so too. However, only a minority (25.2%) would discuss the report with the relatives. A considerable proportion (20.0%) found the cause of death surprising, and a significant number (10.4%) felt the report would modify their future clinical practice. There was approval of autopsies in general, with most (88.6%) agreeing that autopsies reveal lesions not detected in life, and many (74.4%) indicating that loss of the autopsy would impair severely the monitoring of clinical standards. Conclusions - General practitioners appreciate autopsy reports, which may have a significant impact on clinical practice. Autopsy reports provide both case audit and information for relatives.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karunaratne, S., & Benbow, E. W. (1997). A survey of general practitioners’ views on autopsy reports. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 50(7), 548–552. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.50.7.548

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free