Functional trade-offs in the mechanical design of integrated products - Impact on robustness and optimisability

8Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It is generally accepted in industry and academia that trade-offs between functional design objectives are an inevitable factor in the development of mechanical systems. These trade-offs can have a large influence on the achievable robustness and performance of the final design, with many products only functioning in narrow sweet-spots between different objectives. As a result, the design process of multifunctional products can be prolonged when designers concurrently attempt to find sweet-spots between a number of potentially interdependent trade-offs.This paper will show that designers only have six different approaches available when attempting to manage a trade-off while trying to ensure robustness and a sufficient performance. These fall within one of three categories; accept, optimise, or redesign. Selecting the wrong approach, can result in consequences downstream which can be difficult to predict, amongst others a lack of robustness to geometric variation, constrained performance, and long development lead time.This points to a substantial potential in the synthesis of design methods that support the identification and management of trade-offs in early product development.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sigurdarson, N. S., Eifler, T., & Ebro, M. (2019). Functional trade-offs in the mechanical design of integrated products - Impact on robustness and optimisability. In Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design (Vol. 2019-August, pp. 3491–3500). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.356

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free