Manufacturing equipment retrofitting towards Industry 4.0 standards - a systematic overview of the literature

3Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is a systematic literature review on retrofitting tools, equipment, and infrastructure in the industrial domain. The methods used for the research were a systematic literature review: publication analysis, selection of databases, and appropriate modification of queries in individual databases. Findings were presented using a map of keywords, clusters, and charts. The main result of the conducted research was the identification of the main trends in the retrofitting area. The trends developed within the review can support further research into the direction of retrofitting methods and the factors determining the choice of specific techniques and tools in the digitalisation of manufacturing enterprises.

References Powered by Scopus

Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review

1797Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Opportunities of Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0

1429Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review

862Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Retrofitting Digital Twins of Existing Systems

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Theoretical analysis and technical application of mechanical intelligent manufacturing based on system digital-driven technology

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

HRM AREAS INFLUENCED BY NEW TECHNOLOGIES OF INDUSTRY 4.0 – BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Słowik, M., & Sierocka, H. (2023). Manufacturing equipment retrofitting towards Industry 4.0 standards - a systematic overview of the literature. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 15(3), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2023-0017

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

57%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

43%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 4

57%

Social Sciences 2

29%

Arts and Humanities 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free