The Cynic Scandal: Parrhesia, Community, and Democracy

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The aim of this article is to study parrhesia as a form of political performativity. The study of parrhesia as a speech act has been inaugurated by the researches of Lorenzini, who has proposed an in-depth analysis of the parrhesiastic speech act: we nonetheless believe that some features of parrhesiastic performativity urge us to broaden some aspects of his theory. In the first section of this article we will study the nature of parrhesiastic utterance, where Lorenzini’s theses will be discussed through the use of Butler’s approach. In the second section, we will examine the characteristics of Cynic performativity through our theoretical framework, in order to give an example of its effectiveness. We will put forward, then, an overall interpretation of parrhesia, which will be redefined as a communitarian performativity and, furthermore, as an innovative model of radical democracy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Di Gesu, A. (2022). The Cynic Scandal: Parrhesia, Community, and Democracy. Theory, Culture and Society, 39(3), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276420979036

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free