Assessing the validity of the Triage Risk Screening Tool in a third world setting

4Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Social risk is rarely evaluated in older emergency department (ED) patients, although its identification can reduce re-attendance. Objectives: This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the Triage Risk Screening Tool (TRST) in the ED of a developing country. Methods: The diagnostic accuracy of the TRST to detect elderly adults in need of social service intervention was compared with routine clinical evaluation, using comprehensive evaluation by an experienced social worker as the “gold standard”. The inter-rater reliability of the TRST was assessed on a separate cohort of patients prior to the main study. Results: The sensitivity of the TRST was 94.7% versus 55.6% for physician assessment. The TRST had good inter-rater reliability (Cohen’s kappa =.882), and physicians found it easy to use. Conclusion: The TRST provides a rapid means of assessing risk in older ED patients. This study confirmed the validity of this screening tool in a third world setting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lalla, R., Sammy, I., Paul, J., Nunes, P., Ramcharitar Maharaj, V., & Robertson, P. (2018). Assessing the validity of the Triage Risk Screening Tool in a third world setting. Journal of International Medical Research, 46(2), 557–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060517714935

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free