Guilty by stereotypic association: Country animosity and brand prejudice and discrimination

54Citations
Citations of this article
131Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This research tests the proposition that brands suffer prejudice and discrimination due to animosity toward a country with which they have a strong stereotypic association. In the first study, attitudinal data collected across a range of brands that vary in terms of the strength of the brand-country association indicate that brands with strong stereotypic association with a country suffer direct prejudice, in the form of more negative attitudes, related to animosity. When the brand-country association is less strong, the relationship between animosity and brand attitudes is moderated by the strength of the stereotypic association. In the second study, the level of brand-country association is manipulated experimentally to provide additional evidence of its moderating role on the relationship between country animosity and both prejudice toward (more negative brand attitudes) and discrimination against (less choice) a new brand. © 2009 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Russell, C. A., & Russell, D. W. (2010). Guilty by stereotypic association: Country animosity and brand prejudice and discrimination. Marketing Letters, 21(4), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-009-9097-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free