Can routine neonatal circumcision help prevent human immunodeficiency virus transmission in the United States?

12Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Primary prevention of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) continues to pose an important challenge in the United States. Recent clinical trials conducted in Kenya, South Africa, and Uganda have demonstrated considerable benefit of male circumcision in reducing HIV seroincidence in males. These results have ignited debate over the appropriateness of implementing routine provision of neonatal circumcision in the United States for HIV prevention. This article discusses major contextual differences between the United States and the three African countries where the clinical trials were conducted, and cautions that the applicability of the scientific data from Africa to this country must be carefully considered before rational policy recommendations regarding routine neonatal circumcision can be made as a strategy to prevent the spread of HIV in the United States. © 2009 Sage Publications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xu, X., Patel, D. A., Dalton, V. K., Pearlman, M. D., & Johnson, T. R. B. (2009). Can routine neonatal circumcision help prevent human immunodeficiency virus transmission in the United States? American Journal of Men’s Health, 3(1), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988308323616

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free