Evidence of compression therapy with special consideration of medical adaptive compression systems

Abstract

For several decades, compression therapy, which is associated with few side effects, has been a basis for the conservative treatment of patients with phlebological and lymphological diseases. For the practical implementation of compression therapy, many different materials are available, some with system-specific advantages and disadvantages. Medical adaptive compression systems (MAK) are still a relatively new treatment option in Germany. Apart from the very good practical experience in clinical everyday life, the compilation of the scientific evidence of compression therapy also shows that the scientific data situation is significantly better than for many other medical areas, especially for the treatment of patients with venous diseases. It is important to note that compression therapy must reliably guarantee adequate compression pressure. If these conditions are met, it can be assumed on the basis of the currently available data that the clinical effectiveness of the different compression systems is comparably good. These aspects have now also been well tested for MAK, so that these analogies can be drawn. Therapists today can therefore choose between different, very effective therapy options and take individual factors, patient wishes and economic aspects into account when making their selection.