Imaging patients with suspected brain tumour: Guidance for primary care

45Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The number of referrals by primary care practitioners to secondary care neurology services, particularly for headache, may be difficult to justify. Access to imaging by primary care practitioners could avoid referral without compromising patient outcomes, but the decision to refer is based on a number of complex factors. Due to the paucity of rigorous evidence in this area, available data are combined with expert opinion to offer support for GPs. The study suggests management for three levels of risk of tumour: red flags >1%; orange flags 0.1-1%; and yellow flags <0.1% but above the background population rate of 0.01%. Clinical presentations are stratified into these three groups. Important secondary causes of headache where imaging is normal should not be overlooked, and normal investigation does not eliminate the need for follow-up or appropriate management of headache. ©British Journal of General Practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kernick, D. P., Ahmed, F., Bahra, A., Dowson, A., Elrington, G., Fontebasso, M., … Goadsby, P. J. (2008). Imaging patients with suspected brain tumour: Guidance for primary care. British Journal of General Practice, 58(557), 880–885. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp08X376203

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free