Ethics of human cloning: A comparative study of Western secular and Islamic bioethics perspectives

4Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The comparative approach regarding the ethics of surrogacy from the Western secular and Islamic bioethical view reveals both commensurable and incommensurable relationship. It is not either straight forward 'commensurable' or straight forward 'incommensurable.' Islamic bioethics is straight-forward in prohibiting reproductive cloning on its own features and also guess social chaos and anarchy. Western secular bioethics has both arguments and counter arguments both for and against this scientific innovation. Both are eager to highlight the welfare of the society as a whole but the approaches are not always the same.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sharmin, I., Rusli, B. N., Hanapi, B. M. N., & Rani, B. (2012). Ethics of human cloning: A comparative study of Western secular and Islamic bioethics perspectives. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v11i4.12595

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free