Homopeptide and homocodon levels across fungi are coupled to GC/AT-bias and intrinsic disorder, with unique behaviours for some amino acids

7Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Homopeptides (runs of one amino-acid type) are evolutionarily important since they are prone to expand/contract during DNA replication, recombination and repair. To gain insight into the genomic/proteomic traits driving their variation, we analyzed how homopeptides and homocodons (which are pure codon repeats) vary across 405 Dikarya, and probed their linkage to genome GC/AT bias and other factors. We find that amino-acid homopeptide frequencies vary diversely between clades, with the AT-rich Saccharomycotina trending distinctly. As organisms evolve, homocodon and homopeptide numbers are majorly coupled to GC/AT-bias, exhibiting a bi-furcated correlation with degree of AT- or GC-bias. Mid-GC/AT genomes tend to have markedly fewer simply because they are mid-GC/AT. Despite these trends, homopeptides tend to be GC-biased relative to other parts of coding sequences, even in AT-rich organisms, indicating they absorb AT bias less or are inherently more GC-rich. The most frequent and most variable homopeptide amino acids favour intrinsic disorder, and there are an opposing correlation and anti-correlation versus homopeptide levels for intrinsic disorder and structured-domain content respectively. Specific homopeptides show unique behaviours that we suggest are linked to inherent slippage probabilities during DNA replication and recombination, such as poly-glutamine, which is an evolutionarily very variable homopeptide with a codon repertoire unbiased for GC/AT, and poly-lysine whose homocodons are overwhelmingly made from the codon AAG.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, Y., & Harrison, P. M. (2021). Homopeptide and homocodon levels across fungi are coupled to GC/AT-bias and intrinsic disorder, with unique behaviours for some amino acids. Scientific Reports, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89650-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free