Comparing the rates of low-value back images ordered by physicians and nurse practitioners for Medicare beneficiaries in primary care

20Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the extent of ordering low-value services by. Purpose: To compare the rates of low-value back images ordered by primary care physicians (PCMDs) and primary care nurse practitioners (PCNPs). Method: We used 2012 and 2013 Medicare Part B claims for all beneficiaries in 18 hospital referral ̱regions (HRRs) and a measure of low-value back imaging from Choosing Wisely. Models included random clinician effect and fixed effects for beneficiary age, disability, Elixhauser comorbidities, clinician sex, the emergency department setting, back pain visit volume, organization, and region (HRR). Findings: PCNPs (N = 231) and PCMDs (N = 4,779) order low-value back images at similar rates (NP: all images: 26.5%; MRI/CT: 8.4%; MD: all images: 24.5%; MRI/CT: 7.7%), with no detectable significant difference when controlling for covariates. Discussion: PCNPs and PCMDs order low-value back images at an effectively similar rate.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Reilly-Jacob, M., Perloff, J., & Buerhaus, P. (2019). Comparing the rates of low-value back images ordered by physicians and nurse practitioners for Medicare beneficiaries in primary care. Nursing Outlook, 67(6), 713–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2019.05.005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free