Comparison of machine learning computed tomography-based fractional flow reserve and coronary CT angiography-derived plaque characteristics with invasive resting full-cycle ratio

6Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The aim is to compare the machine learning-based coronary-computed tomography fractional flow reserve (CT-FFRML) and coronary-computed tomographic morphological plaque characteristics with the resting full-cycle ratio (RFR™) as a novel invasive resting pressure-wire index for detecting hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis. Methods: In our single center study, patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who had a clinically indicated coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) and subsequent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with pressure wire-measurement were included. On-site prototype CT-FFRML software and on-site CT-plaque software were used to calculate the hemodynamic relevance of coronary stenosis. Results: We enrolled 33 patients (70% male, mean age 68 ± 12 years). On a per-lesion basis, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of CT-FFRML (0.90) was higher than the AUCs of the morphological plaque characteristics length/minimal luminal diameter4 (LL/MLD4; 0.80), minimal luminal diameter (MLD; 0.77), remodeling index (RI; 0.76), degree of luminal diameter stenosis (0.75), and minimal luminal area (MLA; 0.75). Conclusion: CT-FFRML and morphological plaque characteristics show a significant correlation to detected hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. Whole CT-FFRML had the best discriminatory power, using RFR™ as the reference standard.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baumann, S., Hirt, M., Rott, C., Özdemir, G. H., Tesche, C., Becher, T., … Lossnitzer, D. (2020). Comparison of machine learning computed tomography-based fractional flow reserve and coronary CT angiography-derived plaque characteristics with invasive resting full-cycle ratio. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030714

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free