Between the flags: Implementing a safety-net system at scale to recognise and manage deteriorating patients in the New South Wales public health system

36Citations
Citations of this article
142Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Quality problem: In 2005, the Clinical Excellence Commission (CEC) found that unrecognised patient deterioration remained an important problem in New South Wales (NSW) public hospitals. Initial assessment: The challenge was to design and implement an effective and sustainable safety-net system in all 225 NSW public hospitals. Designing a solution: The CEC's system was designed in collaboration with a broad coalition of partners, including clinicians, managers, system administrators and collaborating agencies. A five-element system comprising governance, standard calling criteria in standard observation charts, two-level clinical emergency response systems (CERS) in each facility, an education programme and evaluation, was designed for state-wide implementation. This system was called 'Between the Flags' (BTF). Implementation: Implementation was led by the CEC on behalf of a NSW coalition, and commenced in January 2010 with the implementation of the Standard Adult General Observation Chart, awareness training for all staff and a CERS in each facility. Evaluation: Since the introduction of BTF, the cardiac arrest rate has declined by 42% (P < 0.05) and the Rapid Response rate has increased by 135.9% (P < 0.05) in NSW. The strength of staff support for BTF has grown with the proportion of respondents strongly agreeing that BTF has benefitted patient safety more than doubling from 21% to 44%, and overall agreement rising from 68% to 82% between 2010 and 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pain, C., Green, M., Duff, C., Hyland, D., Pantle, A., Fitzpatrick, K., & Hughes, C. (2017). Between the flags: Implementing a safety-net system at scale to recognise and manage deteriorating patients in the New South Wales public health system. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 29(1), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzw132

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free